Glen Powell steals the show in How to Make a Killing: A24’s savage eat-the-rich comedy

Show summary Hide summary

• How to Make a Killing review: premise, stakes, and tone
• Plot snapshot: what actually happens on screen
  • Brief setup
  • His plan
• Cast report: who stands out and who doesn’t
• Violence and humor: a comparison with other satirical hits
• Plot mechanics and holes that undermine the thriller
• Direction, pacing, and production choices
• Where the film succeeds and where it stumbles
• Context: A24, trends in modern satire, and audience expectations
• Key cast and crew to note for searchers
• Release details and what to expect at the box office

Streamlined, glossy, and pitched as another satirical swipe at the ultra-wealthy, A24’s How to Make a Killing lands with less bite than its peers. The film wants to sit beside Parasite and Triangle of Sadness in the “eat-the-rich” canon, but it rarely provokes the shock, laughter, or moral punch that made those movies sing.

How to Make a Killing review: premise, stakes, and tone

Writer-director John Patton Ford sets the story inside a world that feels designed like a stealthy video game. The lead, Becket Redfellow, plots a string of murders to reclaim a generational fortune. The set pieces are inventive at times, but the tone wavers between dark comedy and bland thriller.

The film often flirts with social satire. Yet its satire rarely lands hard. Instead of sharp observations about class and entitlement, viewers get a muted revenge tale with half-committed jokes.

Plot snapshot: what actually happens on screen

Brief setup

Becket is the secret son of a once-disgraced scion. Raised far from the Long Island estate, he grows up with strange etiquette lessons and the lingering promise of inheritance.

His plan

• He reconnects with a seductive social climber who pushes him toward the old money world.
• He stalks and eliminates a parade of privileged targets to climb toward the family patriarch.
• An earnest, small-dreams love interest offers a moral counterpoint to the lure of wealth.

Cast report: who stands out and who doesn’t

The supporting players inject energy. The leads feel uneven against that backdrop.

• Glen Powell as Becket: handsomely cast, but his everyman turns rarely convince.
• Margaret Qualley: plays the manipulative connector with camp and charm.
• Jessica Henwick: serves as the moral foil, a quietly grounded presence.
• Ed Harris: the icy grandfather, a credible final boss when he appears.
• Notable support: Raff Law, Zach Woods, Topher Grace, Bill Camp — each brings a distinct comic flavor.

Powell’s performance is the film’s most divisive element. He has leading-man polish, but that sheen undermines the intended underdog angle. Around him, the supporting cast lands sharper comic beats.

Violence and humor: a comparison with other satirical hits

If you expect gruesome spectacle or black-comic jolts, the film subdues both. Many violent moments happen off camera or are telegraphed. The result is less visceral than Ready or Not, less explosively surreal than Triangle of Sadness, and less ruthlessly clever than Parasite.

That restraint could be a stylistic choice. But here it reads as timidity. Scenes that should shock or satire the wealthy feel instead safe and oddly bureaucratic.

Plot mechanics and holes that undermine the thriller

Plot convenience crops up frequently. Investigations shift tone to suit the script, alternating between incompetent and suddenly omniscient law enforcement. For a movie about getting away with murder, it oddly overlooks basic forensic realities.

These gaps create dissonance. Suspense deflates when practical details are ignored. The film asks us to accept implausible leaps without payoff.

Direction, pacing, and production choices

Ford shows moments of stylistic flair. Some murder set pieces are imaginative and darkly comic. But the pacing drags in the middle, and tonal shifts interrupt momentum. The screenplay keeps returning to the revenge road without deepening character stakes.

Visually, the film mixes high-society gloss with grittier backdrops. That contrast works in flashes, but never coheres into a strong thematic statement.

Where the film succeeds and where it stumbles

• Successes: distinctive supporting performances, a few clever kills, slick production design.
• Stumbles: lead casting that blunts emotional investment, inconsistent satire, notable plot holes.

The movie’s key flaw is a lack of clear appetite. It aims for cultural critique and dark fun but settles for a cautionary tale that rarely surprises.

Context: A24, trends in modern satire, and audience expectations

A24 built a reputation for risky, boundary-pushing cinema. Many viewers will place How to Make a Killing alongside recent satires about wealth and power. That comparison is unavoidable — and unforgiving. Expectations shaped by films that mix shock, humor, and moral bite make this picture feel milder than anticipated.

Audiences seeking sharp commentary or outrageous set pieces may be disappointed. Fans of character-driven dark comedies might find moments to enjoy.

Key cast and crew to note for searchers

• Director: John Patton Ford (known for Emily the Criminal)
• Lead: Glen Powell
• Supporting: Margaret Qualley, Jessica Henwick, Ed Harris, Zach Woods, Raff Law, Topher Grace, Bill Camp
• Distributor: A24

Release details and what to expect at the box office

How to Make a Killing opens in theaters on Feb. 20. Early reactions may polarize viewers who compare it directly to sharper satires. The film’s commercial appeal will likely hinge on Powell’s star power and the curiosity factor around its high-concept premise.