Gen Z in crisis: are they utterly screwed?

Show summary Hide summary

• What the economic data actually shows about Gen Z
• Where real pressures still bite: housing and student debt
• How automation and AI threaten early-career ladders
  • Entry-level roles are at risk first
• Politics, DC anecdotes, and the ugly flirtation with extremism
• Why perceptions diverge from statistics: phones, feeds, and comparisons
• What shapes Gen Z’s mood today

Gen Z is caught between two stories: the data showing many young Americans are financially better off than prior cohorts, and the online narrative that paints their future as bleak. That tension helps explain why so many young people feel anxious, distrustful of institutions, and sometimes drawn toward extreme answers to complex problems.

What the economic data actually shows about Gen Z

Several national datasets paint a rosier picture than the popular doom-and-gloom narrative.

• Income: The typical 25-year-old in 2022 earned more, after taxes and inflation, than a boomer of the same age. Median incomes for many in their mid-20s are substantially higher than past generations experienced.
• Wealth: People born in the 1990s — older members of Gen Z and younger millennials — had higher median net worths in 2023 than prior cohorts did at the same age.
• Young wealth records: Median net worth for Americans under 35 hit an all-time high in recent years.
• Jobs: Unemployment among 16-to-27-year-olds reached its lowest level in decades as of mid-year statistics.

Taken together, these facts show that, on several standard measures, many Zoomers are not materially worse off than earlier generations were at the same life stage.

Where real pressures still bite: housing and student debt

Data can hide sharp distributional problems. Young workers face two obvious structural headwinds.

• Housing is scarce in major metro areas. Without family wealth, buying a home is harder than it was for prior generations.
• Tuition costs rose steeply. Many young adults left school with much larger student-loan balances than their parents did.
• In 2022, a large share of Gen Z adults were rent-burdened. High local rents push disposable income down.

Policy interventions could change these outcomes. Lower housing and education costs would reduce the burdens that shape many young people’s financial choices today.

How automation and AI threaten early-career ladders

Even with solid wages and record youth wealth, future risks shape present pessimism. Artificial intelligence looms large in those fears.

Entry-level roles are at risk first

AI tools already perform tasks once reserved for junior staff. They can summarize documents, draft basic analyses, and automate routine office workflows.

• Firms exposed to AI have slowed hiring for lower-tier roles.
• Since the launch of advanced chatbots, the share of recent grads without work has ticked up.
• Surveys find a meaningful portion of Gen Z workers worry AI will cost them jobs soon. About one in five reported being very concerned about losing work in the next two years.

If AI eliminates the early rungs on career ladders, long-term mobility and wealth accumulation for younger cohorts could shrink, while senior managers benefit.

Politics, DC anecdotes, and the ugly flirtation with extremism

Reports from political circles have raised alarms about a minority of young conservatives embracing extremist influencers.

One prominent commentator returned from Washington with a claim: a nontrivial share of young Republican staffers showed sympathy for a known far-right figure. He quoted sources who linked this drift to economic despair.

There are problems with this argument.

• Young staffers in national politics typically have strong career prospects.
• Economic grievance alone is an incomplete explanation for antisemitism or radicalization.
• Extremist attraction is likely the product of mixed influences: social networks, online echo chambers, ideological subcultures, and personal grievances.

In short, while economic angst helps create fertile ground for anger, it does not mechanically translate into extremist politics.

Why perceptions diverge from statistics: phones, feeds, and comparisons

Numbers and lived experience can tell different stories. Perception is shaped by who people compare themselves to.

• Social media expands the set of peers. Young people compare themselves to influencers and celebrities.
• In a world of stark inequality, those upward comparisons often make middle-income users feel disadvantaged.
• Empirical work links social-media use to lower subjective wellbeing among teens and young adults.
• Negative content spreads more easily online. Studies show users are far likelier to share bad news than good.

Loneliness deepens the effect. Gen Z reports less face-to-face socializing, fewer long-term partnerships, and higher levels of isolation than prior generations did at the same age. Social isolation magnifies pessimism and can make objective gains feel irrelevant.

What shapes Gen Z’s mood today

The generation’s disposition reflects multiple currents: real economic headaches, credible worries about automation, and the psychological effects of constant online comparison.

• Objective gains: higher incomes and record young-wealth figures in many datasets.
• Structural burdens: costly housing markets and rising tuition have created major hardships for some.
• Future risk: AI threatens the kinds of entry-level work that historically powered career advancement.
• Perception drivers: social media and loneliness skew views toward a darker outlook.

Understanding these forces helps explain why many young Americans feel uneasy even when some indicators look favorable.