Show summary Hide summary
- Why Jones says this moment feels urgent
- What the data shows about Christian political alignment
- How faith communities have been complicit — and how some are resisting
- Who can still be persuaded, and who probably cannot
- Practical playbook: how churches and individuals can respond
- Politics, race, and the reshaped image of American Christianity
- Why Jones writes to the reluctant believers
- Questions about tone, judgment, and insider perspective
- Signs of movement and hope within religious life
- How his book is meant to be used
Robert P. Jones warns that a dangerous blend of politics and religion is reshaping American life. In his new book, Backslide, he argues that powerful strands of white Christian nationalism are enabling anti-democratic policies. Jones, a religion scholar who grew up Southern Baptist and now runs the Public Religion Research Institute, pitches his work as both a diagnosis and a roadmap for those who want to push back. His case mixes historical comparisons, polling data, and stories of church resistance.
Why Jones says this moment feels urgent
Jones frames our present as an urgent crossroads. He draws a line from troubling acts by the second Trump administration to long-standing alliances between political power and white Christian evangelical voting blocs. For him, the stakes are not abstract. They involve policies that target immigrants and embrace exclusionary rhetoric.
Grunge albums you forgot: 3 underrated gems worth revisiting
Maggie Smith joins our panel for shore leave: exclusive behind-the-scenes stories
He draws on history to sharpen his warning. Jones recalls the story of Martin Niemöller, a German pastor who supported the Nazis early on and later resisted them. Niemöller’s regret over his earlier acquiescence is a moral lesson Jones invokes: delay or silence can mean complicity.
What the data shows about Christian political alignment
Jones combines decades of research with recent polls to paint a portrait of American religion and politics.
- White evangelicals make up roughly 13 percent of the U.S. population.
- Among that group, support for the MAGA-aligned political project is extremely high.
- Still, only about 30 percent of Americans back a Christian nationalist worldview.
From Jones’s perspective, those numbers matter because they show both the depth of the problem and its limits. The Christian nationalist vision is influential, but not dispositive for the whole country.
How faith communities have been complicit — and how some are resisting
Jones argues that some Christian groups have enabled policies at odds with core religious teachings. He points to evangelical enthusiasm for harsh immigration enforcement as an example.
Examples of complicity
- Support among many white evangelicals for stricter immigration measures.
- The normalization of nationalist rhetoric by prominent political figures.
- Longstanding narratives that tie American identity to a narrow religious heritage.
Signs of pushback inside churches
Yet Jones also highlights local and denominational resistance. Mainline Protestant and many Catholic communities have shown more internal debate. Some denominations have adopted statements denouncing Christian nationalism. In some cities, faith congregations organized to protect immigrants and challenge detention center proposals.
These counter-movements suggest a different Christianity is possible — one that centers care and pluralism.
Who can still be persuaded, and who probably cannot
Jones is blunt about prospects for conversion. He sees a hardened core in the white evangelical base that appears unlikely to change.
- Firmly MAGA-aligned voters: low chance of persuasion.
- Divided white Catholics and white mainline Protestants: more open to influence.
- Latino evangelicals: a varied and potentially persuadable group.
His political strategy is therefore pragmatic. Rather than try to persuade the immovable, he calls for organizing among the persuadable and amplifying voices already uncomfortable with the nationalist turn.
Practical playbook: how churches and individuals can respond
Jones outlines concrete steps for believers and communities who want to reclaim their faith from nationalist politics.
- Publicly name Christian nationalism as a theological and civic danger.
- Denominations should issue clear statements so local pastors have guidance.
- Build visible, values-driven institutions that model inclusive Christianity.
- Organize locally to support migrants, monitor enforcement actions, and resist punitive policies.
He also emphasizes training and outreach: helping parishioners understand how scripture and democratic pluralism can coexist. Many clergy he’s met ask how to make that case in Sunday sermons and small groups.
Politics, race, and the reshaped image of American Christianity
A central theme in Jones’s work is the overlap between racial narratives and religious identity. He argues that Christian nationalism often rests on a myth: that the U.S. was meant to be a nation of Christians of European descent.
That story, Jones says, fuels hostility toward African Americans, immigrants, and religious minorities. He links this to denial of systemic racism and to political positions that marginalize vulnerable populations.
Confronting those beliefs, he insists, is necessary for both healthier democracy and healthier faith.
Why Jones writes to the reluctant believers
Jones makes clear he’s not addressing only those who have already embraced the MAGA worldview. Instead, he targets Christians who are uneasy and have stayed quiet. He believes many within mainline traditions feel a growing discomfort but lack clear ways to act.
For him, the goal is to spur public, organized alternatives. He points to political candidates and church leaders who break the mold by combining devout faith with inclusive politics.
Questions about tone, judgment, and insider perspective
Jones acknowledges the sensitivity of labeling religious communities. He writes from both insider and outsider positions: raised in the Southern Baptist world, trained in a Baptist seminary, and now a social-science researcher.
That dual view, he says, creates empathy. He aims to criticize ideas, not demean people, while still making moral judgments where warranted. For Jones, it’s essential to name how certain religious-political fusions cause harm.
Signs of movement and hope within religious life
Despite the alarms, Jones points to encouraging developments. Several denominations have adopted anti-Christian-nationalism statements. Local clergy and congregations have mobilized around immigrant protections and public witness.
- Denominational statements create moral clarity for pastors.
- Local activism has blocked large enforcement projects in some places.
- New political candidates openly fuse faith and inclusive policy.
These activities, Jones suggests, show that a more democratic and compassionate Christian witness can be rebuilt.
How his book is meant to be used
Backslide functions as both a diagnosis and a call to action. It seeks to help those who still value Christian teaching but object to its politicization. Rather than proselytize, Jones aims to offer tools for reclaiming the faith so churches can be a force for inclusion.
He urges people of conscience to act now — to organize, speak, and create public institutions that reflect a pluralistic democracy.
