Show summary Hide summary
Steven Soderbergh returns with a compact, character-driven film that examines what artists leave behind. The Christophers folds a heist-like scheme into a quiet study of fame, family and forgery. Ian McKellen and Michaela Coel anchor a movie that feels intimate, theatrical and quietly cunning.
Soderbergh’s new film on creativity and reputation
Soderbergh has built a reputation for restless reinvention. He alternates slick thrillers with pared-back dramas. The Christophers leans into restraint. Rather than showy tricks, the director lets the story breathe.
Nas slams music industry over disrespect: teases new music, vows to address it
1992 vocal performances: 3 jaw-dropping moments that still amaze
The film is less a spectacle than a chamber piece. Camera moves are economical. Sets feel lived-in. The focus stays on conversations and small, telling gestures.
What the story sets in motion
The plot follows Julian Sklar, a one-time art star now relegated to photo-op fame. Rumors say he’s unwell, even near death. Yet he moves through a decaying London house with curious energy.
Sklar’s children see a final chance to profit. They recruit Lori Butler, an art restorer, to finish eight unseen portrait sketches. These are early works from a famous series known as The Christophers.
- The plan: Lori will become Sklar’s assistant.
- She will find the sketches and paint them in the style of his celebrated period.
- After Sklar’s death, the “discovered” paintings would fetch top prices at auction.
Greed, pressure and hidden motives complicate the scheme. Blackmail and betrayals ripple outward. Then Sklar acts in a way that upends everything: he burns the works.
Why the destruction matters
The act of burning forces questions about ownership and meaning. Is art valuable because of its maker, its history, or market demand? Lori’s connection to the portraits suggests deeper reasons beyond money.
Actors in collision: McKellen and Coel
Ian McKellen turns Sklar into a dazzling showman. He talks in loops, makes grand pronouncements and yet feels fragile. His restlessness is physical—he frequently climbs the house’s staircases.
Michaela Coel’s Lori is quieter, watchful and precise. She listens more than she speaks. When she moves, it’s decisive. Their interactions form the film’s emotional core.
The chemistry between them is electric and paradoxical. One is theatrical, the other controlled. That tension fuels the story’s moral reckonings.
Minimalist direction, maximum focus
Soderbergh resists the impulse to embellish. The film plays like a two-person play at times. Long scenes depend on dialogue, timing and subtext.
Production design underlines decline and memory. Sklar’s townhouse suggests former grandeur. Paints, brushes and aging canvases populate the rooms like clues.
Key themes for art lovers and casual viewers
The Christophers probes familiar but fertile territory. It asks who gets to claim authorship. It asks what legacy actually means in an art market obsessed with provenance.
- Authenticity vs. commerce: When forgery becomes a path to profit, what is lost?
- Family and entitlement: Children who treat an artist’s work as an inheritance, not a trust.
- Creation and responsibility: Why an aging artist might want to destroy his own work.
The film’s moral center
Lori’s role complicates simple judgments. She is both technician and moral agent. Her choices reveal more about authorship than any auction price ever could.
Why The Christophers stands out in Soderbergh’s filmography
Compared with his recent, flashier projects, this film feels intimate and deliberate. It proves Soderbergh can still surprise by narrowing his lens.
He trusts actors and scenario over spectacle. That trust pays off in a movie that is subtle, at times witty, and often quietly provocative.
