Lee Cronin’s the mummy drowns in gore and boredom: tiresome reboot disappoints

Show summary Hide summary

• New mummy myth, old fears: the premise and setup
• Cast, characters, and performances that anchor the film
• Visceral shocks: how the movie handles gore and effects
• Pacing problems and narrative choices that frustrate
• Egyptian thread and the detective angle that almost becomes its own film
• What works, what doesn’t, and who might enjoy it

Lee Cronin returns to familiar nightmare territory with Lee Cronin’s The Mummy, a film that mixes intense body horror with family trauma. It aims for a fresh take on ancient curses but often balances on the edge between inspired and derivative.

New mummy myth, old fears: the premise and setup

The movie abandons the legacy continuity of classic Mummy films. Cronin spins an original tale about a family shattered by a child’s disappearance in Cairo. Years later, the missing girl reappears under terrifying circumstances.

Key plot beats:

• Charlie and Larissa Cannon, once posted in Cairo, now live in Albuquerque with two younger children.
• Their missing daughter, Katie, returns after being found inside an ancient sarcophagus.
• Katie’s body shows severe trauma and odd physical changes. She communicates through clicks and wheezes.

The setup leans into grief as a driving force. The Cannons preserve Katie’s old bedroom and refuse vacations. Their relief at her return clouds judgment and raises the film’s tension.

Cast, characters, and performances that anchor the film

Jack Reynor and Laia Costa portray parents who oscillate between frantic care and wilful denial. Their emotional core explains some of the film’s stubborn choices.

• Young Katie is played initially by Emily Mitchell and, upon her return, by Natalie Grace.
• Verónica Falcón plays Larissa’s mother, who becomes an early target of strange behavior.
• May Calamawy appears as Detective Zaki, connecting the rescue to the original disappearance in Egypt.

Performances are uneven but often compelling. The actors sell parental exhaustion and dread, even when the plot insists they act irrationally. Natalie Grace gives a particularly chilling turn as the altered child.

Visceral shocks: how the movie handles gore and effects

If you’re watching for practical horror and body modification, the film delivers. Makeup and effects work are often startling and unflinching.

Highlights include:

• Scenes of skin detachment and distorted limbs that feel tactile and horrifying.
• Moments of physical rupture that recall Cronin’s penchant for extreme imagery.
• A steady escalation of grotesque set pieces meant to unsettle more than explain.

These sequences are the movie’s most memorable assets. They create a sustained, uncomfortable atmosphere that will satisfy fans of explicit horror.

Pacing problems and narrative choices that frustrate

The film runs roughly 135 minutes and does not always justify that length. Tension builds through repeated shocks, but the narrative rarely expands beyond immediate scares.

Structural issues include:

1. Prolonged scenes where parental denial overrides logical action.
2. Set pieces that peak and then reset without meaningful consequences.
3. A reliance on familiar haunted-child tropes with only slight twists.

At times the plot feels like a collection of stronger ideas from other horror films, rather than a cohesive new vision. The result is impressive gore with less satisfying narrative payoff.

Egyptian thread and the detective angle that almost becomes its own film

One of the more intriguing strands follows Detective Zaki as she reopens the eight-year-old missing persons case. Her investigation yields tense, noir-tinged moments.

This subplot offers:

• A procedural approach that complements the household horror.
• Genuine suspense and a sense of discovery about what happened in Cairo.
• A contrast to the domestic scenes that deepens the film’s mythology.

The balance between housebound terror and on-location detective work is uneven. The Egypt sequences hint at a richer thriller that the main story does not fully realize.

What works, what doesn’t, and who might enjoy it

The film’s strengths are clear: committed performances, striking practical effects, and moments of real physical horror. Those elements will appeal to Cronin fans and viewers who favor body-centric scares.

Weaknesses are equally visible. The pacing stretches tension thin, and major set pieces sometimes conclude without lasting impact. Characters repeatedly make baffling choices that strain credibility.

• Recommended for: viewers who appreciate graphic makeup effects and unsettling child-centered horror.
• Less recommended for: audiences seeking a tightly plotted or psychologically nuanced reinvention.

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy opens in theaters on Apr. 17, offering a visceral, if imperfect, new voice in modern monster cinema.