Show summary Hide summary
- Who filed the suit and what is being claimed
- Defendants named and the monetary demand
- The sample at the center of the dispute
- How the sample is said to have been monetized
- Previous litigation over voice samples involving Bad Bunny
- Public response and his team’s silence
- Timing against the Super Bowl and guest rumors
Just weeks before headlining the Super Bowl Halftime Show, Bad Bunny is entangled in a high-stakes legal fight. A plaintiff alleges her voice was sampled without permission on two tracks, and she’s seeking millions in damages. The case raises fresh questions about consent, sampling practices, and timing as one of music’s biggest stars prepares for a global spotlight.
Who filed the suit and what is being claimed
The lawsuit was brought by Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera. She asserts that recordings of her voice were used without consent on the songs “Solo de Mi” and “EoO.”
Nas slams music industry over disrespect: teases new music, vows to address it
1992 vocal performances: 3 jaw-dropping moments that still amaze
According to the complaint, the recordings were obtained while Rivera and the producer, Roberto Rosado, were students at the Interamerican University of Arecibo. Rivera says she never agreed to commercial use and never signed any release.
Defendants named and the monetary demand
Alongside Rosado, Bad Bunny and his label, Rimas, are listed as defendants. Rivera is seeking $16 million for alleged publicity-rights and privacy violations.
- Claimed misuse in live performances.
- Claimed use on merchandise tied to the artist’s brand.
- Allegation of no written permission or contract.
The sample at the center of the dispute
The brief vocal excerpt repeated in the tracks includes the line “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo”. Media outlets translate this as, “Damn, don’t take away my perreo!”
That phrase refers to a reggaeton dance style and has become a recurring meme on social platforms. Its viral reach is part of the plaintiff’s argument about commercial value and recognition.
How the sample is said to have been monetized
Rivera’s legal filing notes multiple alleged revenue streams tied to the sample.
- Bad Bunny reportedly plays the sample during concerts.
- The sample allegedly appears on items sold as merchandise.
- Its social-media circulation has been used as marketing leverage.
Previous litigation over voice samples involving Bad Bunny
This is not the first time the star has faced claims about unauthorized vocal snippets. In 2023, Bad Bunny was sued by his former partner, Carliz de la Cruz Hernández, over similar allegations.
That prior case has not been fully resolved and adds context to the current dispute.
Public response and his team’s silence
Requests for comment to Bad Bunny’s representatives have not produced immediate replies. Public statements from the artist or label were not available at the time reports surfaced.
Timing against the Super Bowl and guest rumors
The lawsuit arrives with the Super Bowl Halftime Show set for Feb. 8, 2026. The timing magnifies attention on the case.
Rumors have circulated that Drake might appear during Bad Bunny’s set. The two artists previously teamed up on 2018’s “MÍA.”
Observers note the pop-culture line-up since Kendrick Lamar headlined the 2025 halftime show. Any surprise guest would likely draw intense coverage.
Key facts at a glance
- Plaintiff: Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera
- Defendants: Roberto Rosado, Bad Bunny, Rimas
- Tracks involved: “Solo de Mi” and “EoO”
- Claimed damages: $16 million
- Alleged basis: unauthorized voice sample used commercially
- Super Bowl Halftime date: Feb. 8, 2026
