Ronnie Radke denied restraining order against Tommy Lee’s ex Brittany Furlan

Show summary Hide summary

• Radke’s court filing: what he says and what the court did
• Allegations of stalking and online contact
• How the catfishing claim began and its consequences
• Furlan’s response: renewed assertions and emotional posts
• Radke’s counterstatements and reputation concerns
• Public fallout and media attention
• Quick timeline of key developments

A new chapter in the public feud between Falling in Reverse singer Ronnie Radke and actress Brittany Furlan opened this week after Radke asked a Los Angeles court for a temporary restraining order. The request follows months of accusations about online impersonation and alleged in-person harassment, and the dispute has already affected relationships close to both parties.

Radke’s court filing: what he says and what the court did

Radke filed paperwork in L.A. Superior Court seeking immediate protection. In the filing he alleges repeated attempts by Furlan to contact him across social platforms.

• Allegation: Radke claims Furlan harassed him with numerous messages and unwanted encounters.
• Specifics listed: He says Furlan sat outside his home and followed him to a medical appointment.
• Clerk response: The court clerk declined to issue an emergency order, calling the request non-urgent.
• Next step: A judge will consider the request at a hearing scheduled for Friday, January 23.

Allegations of stalking and online contact

Radke’s documents frame the conduct as both online and in-person. He alleges persistent social-media outreach coming from accounts he links to Furlan.

Those claims include messages from multiple accounts and alleged surveillance near his residence. Radke says these incidents occurred after he stopped responding.

How the catfishing claim began and its consequences

The current clash traces back to May 2024, when Furlan publicly said she had been catfished by someone pretending to be Radke. He has denied being the impersonator and said he involved law enforcement.

The episode led to a public split between Furlan and musician Tommy Lee. Both the drama and the breakup have played out on social media and in tabloid coverage since then.

Furlan’s response: renewed assertions and emotional posts

This past weekend, Furlan returned to social channels with a renewed claim that evidence connects Radke to the catfishing. She pointed to details she says are clues and argued she simply wants to move past the ordeal.

She also wrote that she will no longer accept being portrayed as unstable or lying and asked to be left alone by anonymous accounts and burner profiles. In multiple posts she described feeling targeted and misrepresented.

Radke’s counterstatements and reputation concerns

Radke pushed back aggressively, calling Furlan a manipulator and saying the controversy harmed his standing with peers and fans. He complained that the allegations damaged his relationship with Tommy Lee.

Radke emphatically denied ever sending the private messages Furlan described and said the accusations have affected his family and reputation.

Public fallout and media attention

Major outlets obtained the court documents and both sides’ social posts have driven intense online debate. The situation blends legal action, personal accusations, and public spectacle.

• Tabloid and entertainment outlets have covered the filings and social posts.
• Both Radke and Furlan remain active on social platforms, where supporters and critics weigh in.
• The upcoming court hearing could bring new evidence into public view.

Quick timeline of key developments

• May 2024 — Furlan says she was catfished by someone claiming to be Radke.
• Shortly after — Furlan and Tommy Lee announce a split amid the controversy.
• Recent days — Radke files for a Temporary Restraining Order in Los Angeles.
• Clerk decision — TRO was not issued as an emergency; a judge will hear the case on January 23.