Simu Liu disappoints in the Copenhagen test: espionage thriller falls flat

Show summary Hide summary

Simu Liu stars in a tense spy drama that promises high-tech intrigue and moral puzzles but stumbles under the weight of too many threads. The Copenhagen Test tries to mix personal trauma, covert operations and a mystery about a brain hack. It often feels ambitious, yet messy.

How the story kicks off and where it goes

Alexander Hale works as an analyst at The Orphanage, a secretive outfit that watches over U.S. intelligence. He longs for more action after years away from the field.

When Alexander competes for a field role, new responsibilities expose deeper problems. He’s hiding debilitating headaches and panic attacks. Unknown to him, someone has been intercepting his senses via an advanced hacking method.

  • Promotion to field work sparks the central plot.
  • A mysterious neural intrusion creates paranoia and risk.
  • Leadership decides to use Alexander as bait to trace the hacker.

Cast highlights and character dynamics

The series centers on Simu Liu’s Alexander, supported by a broad ensemble. Key players include leaders and handlers who shape the investigation.

  • Simu Liu as Alexander Hale — an analyst turned operative.
  • Kathleen Chalfant as St. George — the secretive founder.
  • Brian d’Arcy James as Peter Moira — the organization’s director.
  • Melissa Barrera as Michelle — Alexander’s romantic interest.
  • Others fill roles as mentors, rivals and handlers.

Performances vary. Some actors bring nuance, while Alexander’s emotional arc feels flat at times. The show struggles to make viewers fully care for its lead.

Technology, espionage and the central mystery

A key hook is a new method that gives an enemy access to everything an operative sees and hears. That breach raises stakes for everyone involved.

The Orphanage was treated as impenetrable. The hack forces the organization to question that assumption and its methods.

  • The brain-based intrusion is the series’ chief thriller element.
  • The plot explores surveillance, trust and institutional vulnerability.
  • Writers layer these ideas with cultural questions, like identity and belonging.

Ambition vs. execution: structure and pacing

The show packs an eight-episode arc with multiple missions, timelines and a large cast. That density blunts tension rather than enhancing it.

Scenes that should build suspense are often diluted by side plots and new characters. The momentum flags as the season progresses.

Tightening the episode count or simplifying timelines might have sharpened the narrative and kept stakes higher.

Themes the series tries to tackle

Beyond espionage, the series attempts to examine identity, prejudice and who qualifies as American. Those ideas are present but not always fully developed.

  • Xenophobia and citizenship debates appear in several subplots.
  • The show asks whether institutions protect or exclude.
  • Personal trust and loyalty are threaded through character choices.

What starts strong but loses cohesion

There’s plenty to admire: an intriguing premise, moments of tension and the technological angle. Yet characters and motivations sometimes land as thin or predictable.

The reveal of the antagonist lacks the punch the setup deserves. Emotional payoffs feel muted after so much narrative noise.

Ambition is clear, but clarity is often missing.

Practical notes for viewers and where to watch

All eight episodes of The Copenhagen Test arrive on Peacock on Dec. 27. The series may appeal to fans of dense spy dramas who enjoy puzzle-like storytelling.

Consider watching with patience: plot threads take time to unfold, and reward depends on how much complexity you tolerate.

Give your feedback

★★★★★

Be the first to rate this post
or leave a detailed review


Post a comment

Publish a comment