Charlotte’s Web review: Amy Adams and Elijah Wood can’t save HBO Max’s middling adaptation

Show summary Hide summary

E.B. White’s Charlotte’s Web has moved generations with its gentle account of friendship and loss. HBO Max’s new three-part animated take seeks to introduce that world to a new audience. The result lands in moments but often feels uneven in voice work, visuals and added story beats.

Behind the scenes: who made this Charlotte’s Web for HBO Max

The special is a co-production between Sesame Workshop and Guru Studios. It was released on HBO Max as a three-part animated event. Yurie Rocha directed the project. The team aimed to modernize White’s novel while keeping the heart of the tale intact.

How the film retells the Wilbur and Charlotte story

The plot follows Wilbur, a piglet saved from the farmer’s knife by young Fern. Wilbur grows, faces the risk of becoming a meal, and is befriended by Charlotte, a barn spider who weaves words into her webs to save him.

  • Wilbur is voiced early by Griffin Robert Faulkner and later by Elijah Wood as he matures.
  • Fern is played by Natalie Chan, who champions the pig as a child.
  • Amy Adams voices Charlotte, the wise spider who engineers Wilbur’s salvation.

Cast and character notes: strong choices and missed chances

The project assembles a high-profile voice cast. Some performances stand out, while others register as uneven.

Principal cast

  • Amy Adams as Charlotte — warm and measured.
  • Elijah Wood and Griffin Robert Faulkner
  • Natalie Chan as Fern.
  • Randall Park as Templeton, the rat, delivers clear comic energy.
  • Other voices include Jean Smart, Cynthia Erivo, Keith David and Danny Trejo.

Some veteran actors give nuanced turns. Others sound oddly detached or underwritten. Jean Smart’s recognizable cadence may pull adult viewers out of the story.

Animation and visual design: where the CGI succeeds and stumbles

Guru Studios’ animation is technically competent but often lacks personality. Animal characters are crafted with attention to texture. Yet many design choices feel inconsistent.

  • Wilbur shows a soft, fuzzy surface that reads as piglike and tactile.
  • Charlotte’s visual design sometimes looks too rigid and artificial.
  • Some backgrounds feel generic and flat, reducing visual depth.

The overall look tries for big-studio polish but occasionally lands somewhere between glossy and plasticky.

New scenes and subplots: padding that changes tone

The adaptation adds moments not found in the book. Some scenes are playful diversions. Others alter the story’s balance and tone.

  • Animal set pieces include a junkyard chase and a hall of mirrors.
  • Human-focused material expands Fern’s family life, adding an aunt and more conflict at home.
  • A late attempt to address social issues is brief and surface-level.

These additions sometimes distract rather than deepen the original themes.

Soundtrack, pacing and editing: rhythm of a three-part special

Broken into three episodes, the adaptation shifts its pace to fill runtime. Some beats stretch longer than necessary.

  • Scenes that hinge on small emotional gestures sometimes feel hurried.
  • Other sequences wander, likely intended to entertain younger viewers.

The music supports mood but rarely lifts scenes into memorable territory.

Moments of emotional truth amid an uneven adaptation

Despite shortcomings, the project inherits power from White’s book. Where the screenplay leans into friendship, loss and change, it can still create quiet, affecting scenes. The book’s core themes remain potent and the film occasionally taps into that well.

Give your feedback

★★★★★

Be the first to rate this post
or leave a detailed review


Post a comment

Publish a comment