Mindy Kaling’s not suitable for work review: Gen Z Hulu comedy is fun but a bit dated

Show summary Hide summary

• What the show is about and why it feels familiar
• Cast and characters to know
• Workplace struggles that steer the plots
• How dating and relationships drive the story
• Moments that try to touch on the present day
• The series’ strengths: warmth, jokes and camaraderie
• Where the series feels out of step
• Room to grow and potential storylines

Mindy Kaling’s new Hulu sitcom Not Suitable for Work lands like familiar company. It mixes the warm comfort of classic ensemble comedies with modern New York life. The series centers on five twenty-somethings sharing a building in Murray Hill as they juggle early careers, messy romances and tight friendships.

What the show is about and why it feels familiar

The premise is straightforward: five neighbors, overlapping lives. They work low-level jobs and pursue dreams. They fall in and out of love. The result is a sitcom that leans into nostalgia.

• Setting: Present-day Manhattan, but with TV-sized apartments.
• Tone: Light, warm and easy to watch.
• Focus: Career frustrations, dating missteps and friend-group dynamics.

Rather than chasing Gen Z trends, the series revisits the sitcom playbook from the 1990s and 2000s. That choice gives the show a cozy familiarity. It also makes the characters feel more Millennial than truly of the 2000s-born generation it depicts.

Cast and characters to know

The ensemble is key. The actors bring chemistry that sells even the more conventional storylines.

• Will Angus as Davis: A romantic, earnest and often awkward presence.
• Ella Hunt as AJ: A junior financial analyst navigating work and multiple love interests.
• Avantika as Abby: An assistant to a celebrity stylist stuck with thankless tasks.
• Nicholas Duvernay as Kel: A med-school dropout chasing acting while teaching.
• Jack Martin as Josh: The network boss’s son who lands a PA job through connections.
• Jay Ellis: Plays the demanding boss who looms over the junior analysts.
• Constance Wu and Victor Garber: Supporting players who add texture.

Workplace struggles that steer the plots

Many episodes revolve around entry-level jobs and office life. The show mines comedy from long hours and bad bosses. The career arcs are familiar, but often fun to watch.

• Junior financial analysts putting in brutal hours.
• An assistant stuck doing grunt work for a celebrity stylist.
• A substitute teacher actor chasing auditions and creative gigs.
• A nepotism-driven PA on an investigative news program.

These setups create moments both comic and sympathetic. Yet the series rarely explores modern work realities like gig platforms or influencer culture.

How dating and relationships drive the story

Romance propels much of the drama. Crushes, missed timings and overlapping affairs keep the momentum.

• AJ, in particular, faces multiple serious suitors in one season.
• Heterosexual pairings dominate the romantic landscape.
• Friend-group reactions and group chat-style gossip fuel the comedic beats.

The show trades bold social commentary for romantic twists. That choice favors easy entertainment over cultural realism.

Moments that try to touch on the present day

Not Suitable for Work occasionally nods to contemporary themes. Those attempts are short and often undercooked.

• An audition that turns out to be an AI motion-capture job.
• A subplot about fighting Reddit conspiracy theories at the network.
• A character regretting a pop-culture tattoo tied to a bygone fandom.

These storylines appear but don’t always land. They signal awareness of modern issues. They rarely become central to the show’s identity.

The series’ strengths: warmth, jokes and camaraderie

Where the show scores is in performance and tone. The cast generates genuine chemistry. Scenes feel like hanging out with friends.

• Character bonds: The three men share rituals that feel sincere.
• Humor: Sharp writing that rarely pushes into darkness.
• Pacing: Quick, breezy half-hour episodes that make for easy bingeing.

One memorable device is the group’s tradition—an evening out to mourn bad news over fancy meals. It’s both funny and touching. It quickly becomes one of the show’s emotional anchors.

Where the series feels out of step

Despite its many charms, the show can feel anachronistic. It often reads like a nostalgia piece rather than a true Gen Z portrait.

• Dating apps and gig work are barely in view.
• The characters rarely face lasting, real-world consequences.
• Some character beats depend on tropes that feel dated.

At times, certain arcs flirt with darker tendencies without fully committing. Other times, the rom-com energy flattens into predictable patterns.

Room to grow and potential storylines

There’s space for the writers to evolve the show. If it continues, it could deepen workplace reality and broaden romantic dynamics.

• Explore content creation and side gigs as income sources.
• Bring dating apps and modern sex culture into sharper focus.
• Move beyond heteronormative setups for richer representation.

With its likable cast, the series can expand beyond comfort TV. New plots could sharpen its cultural relevance while keeping the humor that makes it watchable.