Alice and Steve review: Clement and Walker shine in Hulu’s funny, touching comedy

Show summary Hide summary

• Plot in plain terms: what kicks off the conflict
• Core players and the actors behind them
• How the series balances comedy and pain
  • Moments that mix cringe and poignancy
• Is the central relationship believable?
• What Walker brings: a force of nature
• Secondary threads that deepen the story
• Writing and direction: voice, tone and pacing
• Strengths and limits: where the show shines and where it falters
• Themes worth watching for: loneliness, ownership and middle‑age identity
• Why this show might stick with viewers

When a long friendship fractures over an awkward new romance, chaos and heartbreak follow. Hulu’s British dark comedy Alice and Steve spins that rupture into sharp laughs, bitter revenge and a raw study of middle‑age emotions. The show hooks you with its central conflict and keeps you watching for a performance that refuses to be tidy or small.

Plot in plain terms: what kicks off the conflict

The drama begins when Alice, a woman in her 50s, discovers that Steve, her ex and closest companion for decades, is romantically involved with her 26‑year‑old daughter, Izzy. The detail that they actually tell Alice about it turns the awkwardness into full‑blown war. Over six half‑hour episodes, what starts as anger becomes obsession. Alice sets out to sabotage the match, then to dismantle Steve’s life when sabotage fails.

Core players and the actors behind them

• Alice — played by Nicola Walker: an impulsive, sharp‑tongued woman who masks pain with fury.
• Steve — played by Jemaine Clement: Alice’s ex and longtime friend, a charming but self‑centered man.
• Izzy — played by Yali Topol Margalith: Alice’s daughter, newly back home and emotionally unsettled.
• Daniel — played by Joel Fry: Alice’s patient husband, pushed into an awkward corner.
• Dom — played by Tyrese Eaton‑Dyce: Alice and Daniel’s teen son, whose subplot mirrors larger themes.
• Support: Marcia Warren, Lydia Wilson and Eilidh Fisher add tonal variety as family and foils.

How the series balances comedy and pain

The show lives in the tension between ridiculous one‑upmanship and real sorrow. Many scenes mine embarrassment for laughs: disastrous dinners, petty retaliations and public blowups. Yet the humor never completely crowds out emotion. The writing gives the chaos an emotional anchor, so that every spiteful stunt also reveals a fear beneath it.

Moments that mix cringe and poignancy

• Funeral scenes that become party‑like, exposing how grief and avoidance coexist.
• Social gatherings where passive aggression becomes absurdly theatrical.
• Quiet, unguarded conversations that expose the characters’ loneliness.

Is the central relationship believable?

The romance between Steve and Izzy is deliberately awkward on screen. The series doesn’t sell it as a fated, unstoppable passion. Instead, the connection reads as impulsive and needy. That makes some viewers skeptical. The show asks you to accept the affair not because it’s transcendent, but because it catalyzes the emotional reckoning at the story’s center.

What Walker brings: a force of nature

Nicola Walker’s performance is the series’ undeniable engine. She plays Alice as volatile and vulnerable in the same breath. Rage, regret and a surprising tenderness sit side by side in her scenes. Through small choices, Walker makes Alice readable: the fury is performative, the hurt genuine. Her presence pulls the rest of the cast into sharper focus.

Secondary threads that deepen the story

The series sprinkles in several subplots that echo the main conflict. They prevent the show from being a single‑note revenge tale.

• Daniel’s relationship tensions, including an attraction with a younger colleague.
• Dom’s tentative explorations of identity and flirting, which contrast generations.
• Older relatives and friends who respond with dark humor or bewilderment.

Writing and direction: voice, tone and pacing

Creator Sophie Goodhart and director Tom Kingsley keep the pace brisk. Episodes run short, which sharpens the comic beats. Dialogue leans into deadpan and acidic wit, with occasional moments of sincere reflection. The escalation of petty revenge is carefully staged so the stakes feel both ridiculous and consequential.

Strengths and limits: where the show shines and where it falters

• Strengths: a magnetic lead performance, crisp dialogue and a willingness to let ugly feelings linger.
• Limits: Izzy sometimes feels underwritten, more plot device than fully lived person.
• The central couple’s chemistry isn’t always persuasive, which keeps the affair from fully justifying the fallout.

Themes worth watching for: loneliness, ownership and middle‑age identity

At its core, Alice and Steve examines what people cling to when choices feel like losses. The show probes how adults handle longing, how friendships can look like marriages, and how love and cruelty often share the same roots. Young characters on screen offer a fresh contrast: they treat labels as optional and movement as normal. That generational friction helps the series explore what it means to be stuck.

Why this show might stick with viewers

Even when the plot leans on contrivance, the emotional truth behind the chaos lingers. There’s a bleak humor to watching people sabotage the very things they claim to value. And because the series refuses easy redemption, many scenes resonate beyond the immediate punchline. For anyone attracted to character‑driven dramas with sharp comedic edges, the show delivers moments that sting as much as they amuse.